PatanAn hour ago
- Copy link
- BJP leaders made serious allegations that they were hungry for notes and protested by raining fake notes
A general meeting of Patan Nagar Palika was held on Friday. In which discussions were being held on various works, a fierce protest was held by the opposition members by throwing notes in the assembly, alleging that two Roktok contractors and Savari were massive corruption by the BJP members, with the implication that all the members were hungry for notes. In which fake notes of 500 and 2000 were floated in the meeting and became a topic of great debate in political circles. Opposition members including Bharat Bhatia, Asha Ben Thakor, Neha Ben Patel were involved in this protest.
BJP leaders are hungry for notes and the opposition protested by raining notes
Bharat Bhatia, a member of the opposition, said that there are 39 members of the BJP party in the municipality, all the members come to the municipality from early morning to evening just to commit corruption. Recently, without the approval of the Chairman for the tender of the underground sewerage, this tender has been given repeatedly to the contractors in their own hands, without the approval of the Chairman. Similarly, in the city of Patan, the patch work of the potholes caused by the monsoon has not been completed even after 28 days, but in all the cities again Big potholes and pits have fallen so that a resolution was taken in the meeting to blacklist the contractor who did the work but the contractor has been spared. And one more job is in the absence of giving it, so all the BJP members are hungry for money, there is two rampant corruption, today there is a protest by raining fake notes on them.
Allegations of corruption but no proof
Municipal Vice President Dharmesh Prajapati said that the work of the ruling party is to do development work and the work of the opposition is to make false allegations of corruption. Opposition members have been making allegations for a year but they have not given a single proof. If there is any corruption in the work of the agency, specific action will be taken in this regard. Incidentally, even in the matter of tender, the chairman is aware of this matter, he was out for some reason and did not sign the tender.
